A keyboard trap on a checkout flow blocks purchases and shows up frequently in legal claims, so it ranks high on both scales. A missing label on a decorative graphic in the footer affects fewer people and rarely appears in claims, so it sits lower in the queue. The audit report should already include severity ratings to support this decision.

The mistake to avoid is treating every issue as equal. Working through a report alphabetically or by page order wastes development cycles on minor items while serious problems stay live. Sort by severity, group similar issues so developers can fix patterns at once, and validate fixes before moving down the list. This approach moves a product toward WCAG 2.1 AA conformance faster and reduces exposure during the period when remediation is in progress.

The post Prioritize Accessibility Issues After an Audit appeared first on The ADA Book.

Theme selection drives most of the outcome on Shopify. A theme with strong semantic structure, accessible navigation, and clean form patterns produces far fewer issues than a heavily customized or older theme. Apps and third-party code often introduce issues that the merchant did not write and cannot easily fix from the theme editor.

Scope matters. Auditing every product page is unnecessary when product templates repeat. The evaluation samples representative templates, then flags template-level issues that propagate across the catalog. Custom landing pages, blog posts with embedded media, and any page with unique interactive elements are evaluated separately. The result is an audit report listing each issue, the WCAG criterion it relates to, the location, and remediation direction the developer or theme provider can act on.

The post How to audit a Shopify store for accessibility: what the evaluation covers, why theme matters, and how WCAG conformance is determined. appeared first on The ADA Book.

The EAA went into effect on June 28, 2025 and sets harmonized accessibility requirements across the EU. It directly references EN 301 549, which incorporates WCAG 2.1 Level AA as the technical standard for digital products and services. Covered services include e-commerce, banking, e-books, transportation websites, and consumer-facing software.

The ADA, signed into law in 1990, predates modern web standards. Title II was updated with a final rule that adopts WCAG 2.1 Level AA for state and local government web content and mobile apps, with phased conformance dates in 2026 and 2027. Title III does not specify a technical standard, though courts and the DOJ have consistently pointed to WCAG as the practical benchmark for places of public accommodation.

The practical takeaway is that organizations operating in both regions often work toward WCAG 2.1 AA as a single conformance target, then layer in jurisdiction-specific documentation such as accessibility statements and conformance reports.

The post EAA vs ADA Difference appeared first on The ADA Book.